--- a/tr.html	Wed Jan 22 12:53:23 2014 +0100
+++ b/tr.html	Sun Feb 02 02:50:04 2014 +0100
@@ -92,11 +92,11 @@
             transitions</li>
           <li>If W3C closes a Working Group, they <em class="rfc2119">must</em>
             republish its unfinished work as Notes. </li>
-          <li>Implementation requirements for passing beyond Candidate Recommendation
-            are not simply listed as "2 interoperable implementations", instead
-            a new sections gives guidance on what is considered when assessing "<a
-              href="#implementation-experience">adequate implementation
-              experience</a>".</li>
+          <li>Implementation requirements for passing beyond Candidate
+            Recommendation are not simply listed as "2 interoperable
+            implementations", instead a new sections gives guidance on what is
+            considered when assessing "<a href="#implementation-experience">adequate
+              implementation experience</a>".</li>
           <li>Instead of relying on a Last Call publication for adequate review
             there is a requirement for a Working Group to demonstrate "<a href="#wide-review">wide
               review</a>", while leaving them to achieve this as they see fit.</li>
@@ -378,10 +378,9 @@
       <li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> state who developed the specification, </li>
       <li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> state how to send comments or file bugs,
         and where these are recorded, </li>
-      <li> <em class="rfc2119">should</em> explain how the technology relates
-        to existing international standards and related work inside or outside
-        W3C,</li>
-      <li><em class="rfc2119">should</em> include expectations about next steps,
+      <li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> include expectations about next steps,</li>
+      <li><em class="rfc2119">should</em> explain how the technology relates to
+        existing international standards and related work inside or outside W3C,
         and</li>
       <li><em class="rfc2119">should</em> explain or link to an explanation of
         significant changes from the previous version.</li>