--- a/cover.html Sat Sep 13 23:42:03 2014 +0200
+++ b/cover.html Sat Sep 13 23:45:18 2014 +0200
@@ -1867,10 +1867,7 @@
meeting</a>. The date of the first face-to-face meeting of a
proposed group <span class="rfc2119">MUST NOT</span> be sooner than
<span class="time-interval">eight weeks</span> after the date of the
- proposal. <span class="issue">This was adopted from Activities. Is
- 8 weeks from the proposal date enough, or should it be from e.g.
- Call for Participation, or should we move the requirement to the
- meetings information, or…?</span></li>
+ proposal. </li>
<li>Communication mechanisms to be employed within the group, between
the group and the rest of W3C, and with the general public;</li>
<li>An estimate of the expected time commitment from participants;</li>
@@ -3389,10 +3386,11 @@
February 2000.</dd>
</dl>
<h2>14 <a id="acks">Acknowledgments</a></h2>
- <p>The following individuals have contributed to this draft for a revised
- Process: Art Barstow (Nokia), Mark Crawford (SAP), Cullen Jennings
- (Cisco), Eduardo Gutentag (unaffiiliated), David Singer (Apple), and
- Josh Soref (RIM).</p>
+ <p>The following individuals have contributed to this proposal for a
+ revised Process: Daniel Appelquist (Telefonica), Art Barstow (Nokia),
+ Mark Crawford (SAP), Daniel Glazman (Disruptive Innovations), Cullen
+ Jennings (Cisco), Eduardo Gutentag (unaffiiliated), David Singer
+ (Apple), and Josh Soref (Blackberry).</p>
<p>The following individuals contributed to the development of earlier
versions of the Process: Jean-François Abramatic (IBM, and previously
ILOG and W3C), Dan Appelquist (Telefonica), Art Barstow (Nokia), Ann