--- a/cover.html	Thu Apr 23 16:40:22 2015 -0700
+++ b/cover.html	Thu Apr 23 16:43:32 2015 -0700
@@ -1362,10 +1362,10 @@
         to actually perform reviews of and provide comments on the specification. A second objective is to encourage groups to request
         reviews early enough that comments and suggested changes may still be reasonably incorporated in response to the review. Before
         approving transitions, the Director will consider who has been explicitly offered a reasonable opportunity to review the document,
-        who has provided comments, the record of requests to and responses from reviewers, especially groups identified as dependencies in
-        the charter or identified as <a href="http://www.w3.org/2001/11/StdLiaison.html">liaisons</a> [<a href="#rdf-liaison-list">PUB29</a>],
-        and seek evidence of clear communication to the general public about appropriate times and which content to review and whether such
-        reviews actually occurred. </p>
+        who has provided comments, the record of requests to and responses from reviewers, especially <a href="http://www.w3.org/Guide/Charter.html#horizontal-review">W3C
+          Horizontal Groups</a> and groups identified as dependencies in the charter or identified as <a href="http://www.w3.org/2001/11/StdLiaison.html">liaisons</a>
+        [<a href="#rdf-liaison-list">PUB29</a>], and seek evidence of clear communication to the general public about appropriate times and
+        which content to review and whether such reviews actually occurred. </p>
       <p>For example, inviting review of new or significantly revised sections published in Working Drafts, and tracking those comments and
         the Working Group's responses, is generally a good practice which would often be considered positive evidence of wide review.
         Working Groups <em class="rfc2119">should</em> announce to other W3C Working Groups as well as the general public, especially those