Added link for re-org to come (ISSUE-59), updated for publishing today.
authorcharles
Fri, 06 Dec 2013 09:42:22 +0100
changeset 51 01daf4bcc1fd
parent 50 8fbd3cbf613e
child 52 59ee28366bf8
Added link for re-org to come (ISSUE-59), updated for publishing today.
tr.html
--- a/tr.html	Thu Dec 05 08:16:31 2013 +0100
+++ b/tr.html	Fri Dec 06 09:42:22 2013 +0100
@@ -23,10 +23,10 @@
     <div class="head">
       <p> <a href="http://www.w3.org/"><img alt="W3C" src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_home"
             height="48" width="72"></a> </p>
-      <h1 class="title" id="title">Recommendation Track Process, "Last Call"
-        draft proposal</h1>
+      <h1 class="title" id="title">Recommendation Track Process, post-"Last
+        Call" draft proposal</h1>
       <h2 id="w3c-working-draft-20-september-2012"><abbr title="World Wide Web Consortium"></abbr>Editors'
-        Draft 21 October 2013</h2>
+        Draft 6 December 2013</h2>
       <dl>
         <dt>Current active version:</dt>
         <dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html">http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html</a></dd>
@@ -53,14 +53,15 @@
         <p>This is a revised draft proposal to replace the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html">current
             chapter 7 of the W3C process document</a> with a more effective W3C
           Specification life cycle following the meeting of the W3C Advisory
-          Board's Chapter 7 Task Force on 21 October 2013. This document is an
-          editor's draft of a "Last Call" version. The Task Force resolved at
-          its 21 October meeting to recommend the agreed draft (although the
-          last version they saw was the 9 October draft) as a "Last Call" draft
-          proposed for adoption by the Advisory Committee as a replacement for
-          the existing Chapter 7. Review will take place over several weeks,
-          including the week of W3C's TPAC meeting (10-15 November), before a
-          formal decision on adoption is made.</p>
+          Board's Chapter 7 Task Force on 2 December 2013. This document is the
+          editor's draft for resolution of comments received on the "Last Call"
+          version.</p>
+        <p>As per <a href="http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/59">ISSUE-59</a>,
+          the editor expect to do a significant re-organisation of the content
+          probably between 9 and 18 December 2013. </p>
+        <p>This introductory session (before the chapter title below) will be
+          removed when this chapter is re-incorporated into the full process
+          document, as per issues 60-64.</p>
         <p>An initial version was first proposed to the W3C Advisory Board on 13
           May 2013 as a possible replacement for the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html">current
             chapter 7 of the W3C process document</a>, and a <a href="http://yadi.sk/d/Zikwkr385JG8f">subsequent
@@ -74,13 +75,13 @@
           process will follow the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/processdoc.html#GAProcess">existing
             process for such changes</a>, subject to the resolution of <a href="https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/39">ISSUE-39</a>.</p>
         <p>I am grateful to the W3C Advisory Board, the W3C Process Community
-          Group, Art Barstow, Robin Berjon, Wayne Carr, Marcos Cáceres, Ivan
-          Herman, Ian Hickson, Ian Jacobs, Jeff Jaffe, Chris Lilley, Ralph
-          Swick, Anne van Kesteren, Steve Zilles, and many people I have
-          forgotten to acknowledge for suggestions, comments and discussions
-          that helped me sort out my thinking, and to Ora Lassila for the
-          original version of the image that illustrates the normal process of a
-          W3C Recommendation-track document. </p>
+          Group, Art Barstow, Robin Berjon, Wayne Carr, Marcos Cáceres, Elika
+          Etimad, Ivan Herman, Ian Hickson, Ian Jacobs, Jeff Jaffe, Chris
+          Lilley, Ralph Swick, Anne van Kesteren, Steve Zilles, and many people
+          I have forgotten to acknowledge for suggestions, comments and
+          discussions that helped me sort out my thinking, and to Ora Lassila
+          for the original version of the image that illustrates the normal
+          process of a W3C Recommendation-track document. </p>
         <p>Please send comments on this document to, or participate in, the <a
             href="http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/">W3C Process Community
             Group</a>. Issues related to this proposal are recorded in that