edited 3.2.3.3 again -- a bit more detail, no mention of transitivity
authorPaolo Missier <pmissier@acm.org>
Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:45:32 +0000
changeset 1479 8304b1b3a928
parent 1478 7818ec21cfa5
child 1480 fbcc0445cefa
edited 3.2.3.3 again -- a bit more detail, no mention of transitivity
model/working-copy/towards-wd4.html
--- a/model/working-copy/towards-wd4.html	Tue Feb 07 14:55:51 2012 +0000
+++ b/model/working-copy/towards-wd4.html	Tue Feb 07 15:45:32 2012 +0000
@@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@
   <li><span class="name">e3</span> denoting "Bob, the person".
 </ul>
 
-<p>These entities refer to the same real person Bob, either in different contexts (e1 vs e2), or at different levels of abstraction (e3 is more abstract, i.e., it provides fewer details, than either e1 and e2.
+<p>These entities refer to the same real person Bob, either in different contexts, or at different levels of abstraction. Specifically: e1 and e2 describe Bob from two different perspectives (as facebook and twitter users, respectively) while e3 provides a more abstract perspective (in that it provides fewer details) than both of e1 and e2. 
 
 <!--
 For example:
@@ -1171,9 +1171,9 @@
 </ul>
 </p>
 
-
+<!--
 <p>To promote take up of these relations, it is not specified whether they are transitive or symmetric.  We anticipate that applications will specialize these relations according to their needs. </p>
-
+-->
 
 <div class='issue'>A discussion on alternative definition of these relations has not reached a satisfactory conclusion yet. This is <a
 href="http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/29">ISSUE-29</a>. Also <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/96">ISSUE-96</a>.</div>