Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:16:03 -0700Added IP address issue default tip
Andy Zeigler <andyzei@microsoft.com> [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:16:03 -0700] rev 14
Added IP address issue

Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:34:12 -0700Issue 1: Resolved. We'll leave the name as-is for now.
Andy Zeigler <andyzei@microsoft.com> [Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:34:12 -0700] rev 13
Issue 1: Resolved. We'll leave the name as-is for now.

Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:34:05 -0700numbering all of the open issues in the document so that they can be referenced more easily in email threads.
andyzei@andyzei-w8cp.redmond.corp.microsoft.com [Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:34:05 -0700] rev 12
numbering all of the open issues in the document so that they can be referenced more easily in email threads.

Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:23:44 +0100adding a paragraph above the SOTD boilerplate to explicit say that the document is not an expression of the WG
Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> [Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:23:44 +0100] rev 11
adding a paragraph above the SOTD boilerplate to explicit say that the document is not an expression of the WG

Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:40:49 +0100adding andy, karl name for the status to replace the undefined
Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> [Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:40:49 +0100] rev 10
adding andy, karl name for the status to replace the undefined

Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:31:47 +0100removing WG name from the status section
Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> [Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:31:47 +0100] rev 9
removing WG name from the status section

Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:25:14 -0500new issue: we should not try to guess what is the role of url filtering
Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> [Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:25:14 -0500] rev 8
new issue: we should not try to guess what is the role of url filtering

Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:24:38 -0500rewriting a bit. Removed consumers for users. changed web by Web etc using the manual of style from W3C
Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> [Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:24:38 -0500] rev 7
rewriting a bit. Removed consumers for users. changed web by Web etc using the manual of style from W3C

Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:11:11 -0500third party is vaguely defined in compliance and not in the way we are using it in this document
Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> [Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:11:11 -0500] rev 6
third party is vaguely defined in compliance and not in the way we are using it in this document

Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:41:59 -0500Should the title be changed for something more generic
Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> [Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:41:59 -0500] rev 5
Should the title be changed for something more generic