Add catch-all issue box in Section 1
authorRichard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Thu, 26 May 2011 12:47:48 +0100
changeset 17 aa4f57dc2b90
parent 16 769d92895061
child 18 c2b59932af6f
child 20 cc3fb1e4ac5d
Add catch-all issue box in Section 1
index.html
--- a/index.html	Wed May 25 22:06:09 2011 +0100
+++ b/index.html	Thu May 26 12:47:48 2011 +0100
@@ -172,6 +172,28 @@
     Others (cf. OWL [[OWL-REF]] and
     the applications mentioned in the primer 
     [[RDF-PRIMER]]) are in development.</p>
+
+    <div class="issue">
+      <p>This document reflects current progress of the RDF Working
+      Group towards updating the
+      <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/">2004
+      version of <em>RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax</em></a>. The
+      editors expect to work on a number of issues, some of which are
+      listed below, and more are listed in boxes like this throughout
+      the document.</p>
+      <ul>
+        <li>Too strongly coupled with RDF/XML; it's now just one out of many syntaxes and should perhaps not even be a normative reference</li>
+        <li>Move some content between RDF Semantics, RDF Schema and this document</li>
+        <li>Revisit informative sections 2 and 3; do they add value? Section 3 is very redundant with later normative sections</li>
+        <li>RFC 3066 is obsoleted by BCP47</li>
+        <li>RFC 2279 is obsoleted by RFC 3629</li>
+        <li>RFC 2396 is obsoleted by RFC 3986</li>
+        <li>Change OWL reference to OWL2?</li>
+        <li>Change XHTML10 reference to XHTML5?</li>
+        <li>Should discuss rdf:PlainLiteral</li>
+      </ul>
+    </div>
+
 </section>