--- a/rdf-spaces/index.html	Tue May 15 07:47:32 2012 -0400
+++ b/rdf-spaces/index.html	Tue May 15 08:45:40 2012 -0400
@@ -733,7 +733,7 @@
     formally stated in <a href="#semantics" class="sectionRef"></a>,
     and the semantics of OWL, where { ?a owl:sameAs ?b } means that
     the terms ?a and ?b both denote the same thing, the second dataset
-    above entails the first, and includes only additional information
+    above entails the first and includes only additional information
     that is known to be true.  (Slight caveat: the new information is
     only true if the assumptions of the name-generation function are
     correct, that the name is previously unused and this naming agent
@@ -754,7 +754,7 @@
     addressing the use case described in <a href="#uc-untrusted"
     class="sectionRef"></a> and is illustrated in <a
     href="#example-untrusted" class="sectionRef"></a>.  It uses quads
-    to addresses some&mdash;perhaps all&mdash;of the need for quints
+    to address some&mdash;perhaps all&mdash;of the need for quints
     or nested graphs.</p>
 
     <p>More precisely:</p>
@@ -869,10 +869,9 @@
     class="sectionRef"></a>.
   </p>
 
-  <p class="issue">Do the named graphs in a dataset include all the
-  triples in the spaces with those names, or only some of them?  Aka
-  partial-graph or complete-graph semantics.  Assuming partial, but
-  maybe we can say something about how things SHOULD be done?</p>
+  <p>@@@ explain why we use partial-graph semantics, and how in most
+  applications its bad to drop information, but sometimes it's
+  necessary, and sometimes you only have incomplete information.</p>
 
 </section>