author Tim L <lebot@rpi.edu>
Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:17:00 -0500
changeset 1152 e0d6f1a69062
parent 999 2b178b5b5ab0
permissions -rw-r--r--
wasStartedBy diagram
@prefix rdf:     <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs:    <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd:     <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
@prefix owl:     <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix time:    <http://www.w3.org/2006/time#> .
@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix skos:    <http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos#> .
@prefix prov:    <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o/> .
@prefix :        <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Nov/0170.html#> .

<unqualified> {
      rdfs:seeAlso <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Nov/0170.html>;
      dcterms:description "blogpost wasDerivedFrom Report at 10am Thursday"; 
      a prov:Entity;
      prov:wasDerivedFrom :report;
      a prov:Entity;

<full_qualification> {
   <full_qualification> rdfs:comment "fully expanded notion of derivation: wasDerivedFrom(e2,e1,pe,q2,q1)";
      a prov:ProcessExecution;
      prov:used :report;
      prov:qualifiedUsage [
         a prov:Usage;
         a prov:time "2011-11-24T14:00:00-05:00"^^xsd:dateTime;

<lazy_qualification> {
   <lazy_qualification> dcterms:description
"""Sure there is some process there, there may be an interval. But I just don't want to assert all that information.

Again, my fundamental thing is that I want to assert derivation chains without (knowingly) asserting anything about process.""";