The results of this questionnaire are available to those with member access on the W3C site. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: zednis@rpi.edu
This questionnaire is open from 2012-01-11 to 2013-03-30.
5 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
Responder | Name | URL | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Miguel Angel García | Geometry enhancer | http://geo.linkeddata.es/ | Geometry enhancer is a tool to enrich an RDF with locations by querying different web services. The provenance of the whole process is tracked using PROV-O terms. |
Victor Rodriguez | Music Ontology to Media Value Chain Ontology and PROV-O Ontology Mapping | http://oeg-dev.dia.fi.upm.es/mvco-prov/ | Mapping between the Music Ontology, the Media Value Chain Ontology and the PROV-O. The Music Ontology describes general musical-related concepts, the Media Value Chain Ontology describes the Intellectual Property along the multimedia life-cycles and the PROV-O Ontology is the W3C standard for representing provenance information in the web. Together, these ontologies provide an homogeneous access to the chain of intermediate objects and actions that happen until a musical work is ready to be consumed (also known as the Music Workflow). |
Luc Moreau | PROV-DM: the PROV data model | http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/ | Provenance is information about entities, activities, and people involved in producing a piece of data or thing, which can be used to form assessments about its quality, reliability or trustworthiness. PROV-DM is the conceptual data model that forms a basis for the W3C provenance (PROV) family of specifications. PROV-DM distinguishes core structures, forming the essence of provenance information, from extended structures catering for more specific uses of provenance. PROV-DM is organized in six components, respectively dealing with: (1) entities and activities, and the time at which they were created, used, or ended; (2) derivations of entities from entities; (3) agents bearing responsibility for entities that were generated and activities that happened; (4) a notion of bundle, a mechanism to support provenance of provenance; (5) properties to link entities that refer to the same thing; and, (6) collections forming a logical structure for its members. This document introduces the provenance concepts found in PROV and defines PROV-DM types and relations. The PROV data model is domain-agnostic, but is equipped with extensibility points allowing domain-specific information to be included. Two further documents complete the specification of PROV-DM. First, a companion document specifies the set of constraints that provenance should follow. Second, a separate document describes a provenance notation for expressing instances of provenance for human consumption; this notation is used in examples in this document. The PROV Document Overview describes the overall state of PROV, and should be read before other PROV documents. |
Jens Lehmann | DBpedia | http://dbpedia.org | |
Rinke Hoekstra | AERS-LD | http://aers.data2semantics.org | RDF representation of the Adverse Events repository of the FDA. Contains descriptions in PROV on how this data was constructed. |
Responder | Name | |
---|---|---|
Miguel Angel García | Daniel Garijo | dgarijo@fi.upm.es |
Victor Rodriguez | Daniel Garijo | dgarijo@fi.upm.es |
Luc Moreau | Luc Moreau (prov-dm editor, on behalf of the Provenance Working Group) | l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk |
Jens Lehmann | Jens Lehmann | lehmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de |
Rinke Hoekstra | Rinke Hoekstra | rinke.hoekstra@vu.nl |
summary | by responder | by choice
Choose all that apply
(The results on your answers appears in bold)
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
PROV-O | 4 |
PROV-N | 1 |
PROV-XML |
Skip to view by choice.
Responder | PROV Encodings Supported | Please list any additional supported encodings (e.g. PROV-JSON, PROV-CSV, etc.) in the free-text area below |
---|---|---|
Miguel Angel García |
|
|
Victor Rodriguez |
|
|
Luc Moreau |
|
|
Jens Lehmann |
|
|
Rinke Hoekstra |
|
Choice | Responders |
---|---|
PROV-O |
|
PROV-N |
|
PROV-XML |
Indicate covered features by selecting one of the following below:
(The results on your answers appears in bold)
Choice | All responders | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | No opinion | |
Entity | 4 | 1 | ||
Activity | 4 | 1 | ||
Agent | 4 | 1 | ||
Generation | 4 | 1 | ||
Usage | 4 | 1 | ||
Communication | 2 | 3 | ||
Derivation | 4 | 1 | ||
Attribution | 3 | 2 | ||
Association | 3 | 2 | ||
Delegation | 2 | 3 | ||
Start | 1 | 4 | ||
End | 1 | 4 | ||
Invalidation | 1 | 4 | ||
Revision | 2 | 3 | ||
Quotation | 1 | 4 | ||
PrimarySource | 1 | 4 | ||
Person | 1 | 4 | ||
Organization | 1 | 4 | ||
SoftwareAgent | 2 | 3 | ||
Plan | 2 | 3 | ||
Influence | 1 | 4 | ||
Bundle | 1 | 4 | ||
Specialization | 1 | 4 | ||
Alternate | 1 | 4 | ||
Collection | 1 | 4 | ||
EmptyCollection | 1 | 4 | ||
Membership | 1 | 4 | ||
Identifier | 1 | 4 | ||
Attributes | 1 | 4 | ||
Label | 1 | 4 | ||
Location | 1 | 4 | ||
Role | 1 | 4 | ||
Type | 1 | 4 | ||
Value | 1 | 4 |
Averages:
Choices | All responders: |
---|---|
Value | |
Entity | 2.00 |
Activity | 2.00 |
Agent | 2.00 |
Generation | 2.00 |
Usage | 2.00 |
Communication | 2.00 |
Derivation | 2.00 |
Attribution | 2.00 |
Association | 2.00 |
Delegation | 2.00 |
Start | 2.00 |
End | 2.00 |
Invalidation | 2.00 |
Revision | 2.00 |
Quotation | 2.00 |
PrimarySource | 2.00 |
Person | 2.00 |
Organization | 2.00 |
SoftwareAgent | 2.00 |
Plan | 2.00 |
Influence | 2.00 |
Bundle | 2.00 |
Specialization | 2.00 |
Alternate | 2.00 |
Collection | 2.00 |
EmptyCollection | 2.00 |
Membership | 2.00 |
Identifier | 2.00 |
Attributes | 2.00 |
Label | 2.00 |
Location | 2.00 |
Role | 2.00 |
Type | 2.00 |
Value | 2.00 |
Responder | Entity | Activity | Agent | Generation | Usage | Communication | Derivation | Attribution | Association | Delegation | Start | End | Invalidation | Revision | Quotation | PrimarySource | Person | Organization | SoftwareAgent | Plan | Influence | Bundle | Specialization | Alternate | Collection | EmptyCollection | Membership | Identifier | Attributes | Label | Location | Role | Type | Value | Rationale | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Miguel Angel García | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | ||
Victor Rodriguez | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | 2 | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | The document http://oeg-dev.dia.fi.upm.es/mvco-prov/ Explains the rationale for each mapping in detail. The mapping proposes some subclassing of PROV-O concepts (so it could be considered an extension). However, since no new classes are proposed, it has been considered a "PROV usage". | |
Luc Moreau | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | PROV-DM defines all these PROV features and illustrates them using the PROV notation. | |
Jens Lehmann | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | ||
Rinke Hoekstra | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | No opinion | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | 2 | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion |
Responder | Provenance Exchange |
---|---|
Miguel Angel García | |
Victor Rodriguez | |
Luc Moreau | All the examples in this document can be validated by ProvValidator (which is built in on the ProvToolbox used to parse them). |
Jens Lehmann | |
Rinke Hoekstra | Yes, it is generated by http://gitub.com/Data2Semantics/raw2ld |
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire