Initial framework for UCR doc in ReSpec
authorsspeiche
Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:26:11 -0500
changeset 22 55dc01a9ed48
parent 21 0a04ba606cb6
child 23 51eff68f0e53
Initial framework for UCR doc in ReSpec
ldp-ucr.html
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/ldp-ucr.html	Fri Dec 14 15:26:11 2012 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+  <head>
+    <title>Linked Data Platform 1.0</title>
+    <meta http-equiv='Content-Type' content='text/html;charset=utf-8'/>
+    <!-- 
+      === NOTA BENE ===
+      For the three scripts below, if your spec resides on dev.w3 you can check them
+      out in the same tree and use relative links so that they'll work offline,
+     -->
+    <script src='http://www.w3.org/Tools/respec/respec-w3c-common' class='remove' async></script> 
+    <script class='remove'>
+      var respecConfig = {
+          // specification status (e.g. WD, LCWD, NOTE, etc.). If in doubt use ED.
+          specStatus:           "ED",
+          
+          // the specification's short name, as in http://www.w3.org/TR/short-name/
+          shortName:            "ldp-ucr",
+          // TODO: Confirm short name
+
+          // if your specification has a subtitle that goes below the main
+          // formal title, define it here
+          // subtitle   :  "an excellent document",
+
+          // if you wish the publication date to be other than today, set this
+          // publishDate:  "2009-08-06",
+
+          // if the specification's copyright date is a range of years, specify
+          // the start date here:
+          // copyrightStart: "2005"
+
+          // if there is a previously published draft, uncomment this and set its YYYY-MM-DD date
+          // and its maturity status
+          previousPublishDate:  "2012-03-26",
+          previousMaturity:  	"Member-SUBM",
+          previousURI: 			"http://www.w3.org/Submission/2012/SUBM-ldbp-20120326/",
+
+          // if there a publicly available Editor's Draft, this is the link
+          edDraftURI:           "http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/hg/ldp-ucr.html",
+
+          // if this is a LCWD, uncomment and set the end of its review period
+          // lcEnd: "2009-08-05",
+
+          // if you want to have extra CSS, append them to this list
+          // it is recommended that the respec.css stylesheet be kept
+          //extraCSS:             ["https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/css/respec.css"],
+
+          // editors, add as many as you like
+          // only "name" is required
+          editors:  [
+              { name:"Steve Battle", url: "http://stevebattle.me",
+                company: "Sysemia Limited", companyURL: "http://www.sysemia.com" },
+              { name:"Steve Speicher", url: "http://stevespeicher.me",
+                company: "IBM Corporation", companyURL: "http://ibm.com/" }
+          ],
+
+          // authors, add as many as you like. 
+          // This is optional, uncomment if you have authors as well as editors.
+          // only "name" is required. Same format as editors.
+
+          //authors:  [
+          //    { name: "Your Name", url: "http://example.org/",
+          //      company: "Your Company", companyURL: "http://example.com/" },
+          //],
+          
+          // name of the WG
+          wg:           "Linked Data Platform Working Group",
+          
+          // URI of the public WG page
+          wgURI:        "http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp",
+          
+          // name (without the @w3c.org) of the public mailing to which comments are due
+          wgPublicList: "public-ldp-wg",
+          
+          // URI of the patent status for this WG, for Rec-track documents
+          // !!!! IMPORTANT !!!!
+          // This is important for Rec-track documents, do not copy a patent URI from a random
+          // document unless you know what you're doing. If in doubt ask your friendly neighbourhood
+          // Team Contact.
+          wgPatentURI:  "http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/55082/status",
+          doRDFa: "1.1"
+      };
+    </script>
+    <style type="text/css">
+    	div.rule {padding-top: 1em;}
+    	div.ldp-issue {
+	    	border-color: #E05252;
+			background: #FBE9E9;
+			padding: 0.5em;
+			margin: 1em 0;
+			position: relative;
+			clear: both;
+			border-left-width: .5em;
+			border-left-style: solid;
+    	}
+    	div.ldp-issue-title {
+    	    color: #E05252;
+    	    padding-right: 1em;
+            min-width: 7.5em;
+    	}
+    </style>
+  </head>
+<body>
+<section id='abstract'>
+A set of best practices and simple approach for a read-write Linked Data architecture, based on
+HTTP access to web resources that describe their state using RDF.
+</section>
+
+<section id='status'>
+<p>
+This document is currently under review pending release as a First Public Working Draft. While the 
+editors have made every effort to identify a set of use-cases that are both evidenced in user-stories 
+and in-scope of the charter, the document may yet be missing some key unidentified use-cases, or indeed, m
+ay include use-cases that ought to be removed. Furthermore, the coarse grouping of use-cases to avoid CRUDdy 
+operations may not be to people's taste and is open to challenge.</p>
+<p>
+Following feedback from the face-to-face, the use-cases are captured in a narrative style that describes a behaviour, or set of behaviours drawn from user-stories. They are embellished with concrete examples drawn from representative user-stories. The aim throughout has been to avoid details of protocol (specifically the HTTP protocol), and use of any specific vocabulary that might be introduced by the LDP specification.
+</p>
+</section>
+ 
+<section>
+<h1 id="intro">Scope and Motivation</h1>
+
+</section>
+	
+<section>
+<h1 id="userstories">User Stories</h1>
+
+</section>
+
+<section>
+<h1 id="usecases">Use Cases</h1>
+
+</section>
+
+<section>
+<h1 id="reqs">Requirements</h1>
+
+</section>
+
+
+<section class='appendix informative'>
+<h2>Acknowledgements</h2>
+  
+</section>
+    
+<section class='appendix informative' id="history">
+<h1>Change History</h1>
+<ul>
+	<li>2012-12-14 - Initial ReSpec'ing framework for <a href="http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Use_Cases_And_Requirements">Workgroup working wiki document</a> (SS)</li>
+</ul></section>
+    
+  </body>
+</html>