Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:30:16 -0700
[css3-exclusions] re-word issue 1
css3-exclusions/Exclusions.src.html | file | annotate | diff | comparison | revisions | |
css3-exclusions/Overview.html | file | annotate | diff | comparison | revisions |
1.1 --- a/css3-exclusions/Exclusions.src.html Thu Sep 13 13:22:46 2012 -0700 1.2 +++ b/css3-exclusions/Exclusions.src.html Thu Sep 13 13:30:16 2012 -0700 1.3 @@ -709,8 +709,31 @@ 1.4 <div class="issue-details"> 1.5 <p class="short-desc">Is the CSS exclusions processing model incorrect?</p> 1.6 </div> 1.7 - </div> 1.8 + </div> 1.9 + </div> 1.10 1.11 + <div class="issue"> 1.12 + 1.13 + <p>The current draft provides a model for exclusions 1.14 + without a collision-avoidance model. 1.15 + The existing exclusion model in CSS uses floats, 1.16 + which have both exclusion and collision-avoidance behavior. 1.17 + Concerns have been raised that allowing exclusions 1.18 + without collision avoidance could be harmful, 1.19 + particularly with absolutely-positioned elements. 1.20 + Three options should be considered:<p> 1.21 + <ol> 1.22 + <li>Allow exclusions in positioning schemes 1.23 + with no collision avoidance.</li> 1.24 + <li>Disallow exclusions in positioning schemes 1.25 + with no collision avoidance.</li> 1.26 + <li>Define collision-avoidance behavior 1.27 + for positioning schemes without it, 1.28 + and use this behavior by default with exclusions.</li> 1.29 + <ol> 1.30 + </div> 1.31 + 1.32 + <div class="issue-marker wrapper"> 1.33 <div class="issue-marker" data-bug_id="15083" data-bug_status="NEW"> 1.34 <a href="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15083">Issue-15083</a> 1.35 <div class="issue-details"> 1.36 @@ -718,20 +741,6 @@ 1.37 </div> 1.38 </div> 1.39 </div> 1.40 - 1.41 - <p class="issue"> 1.42 - The rules for exclusions order and exclusions on absolutely positioned elements 1.43 - (particularly those with static position) build this exclusions model on top of 1.44 - the absolute positioning model in CSS Level 2, rather than on top of floats, the 1.45 - existing exclusion model in CSS Level 1 and 2. The CSS Working Group has not reached 1.46 - consensus on whether it intends to base the new exclusions features in this specification 1.47 - on top of absolute positioning (as these sections of this specification do) or on 1.48 - top of floats. 1.49 - </p> 1.50 - 1.51 - <p class="note"> 1.52 - This module does not depend on any particular positioning scheme. 1.53 - </p> 1.54 1.55 <h3 id="exclusions-processing-model">Processing model</h3> 1.56
2.1 --- a/css3-exclusions/Overview.html Thu Sep 13 13:22:46 2012 -0700 2.2 +++ b/css3-exclusions/Overview.html Thu Sep 13 13:30:16 2012 -0700 2.3 @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ 2.4 <link href="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" rel=schema.DC> 2.5 <meta content="CSS Exclusions and Shapes Module Level 3" name=DC.title> 2.6 <meta content=text name=DC.type> 2.7 - <meta content=2012-09-05 name=DC.issued> 2.8 + <meta content=2012-09-13 name=DC.issued> 2.9 <meta content="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-exclusions/" name=DC.creator> 2.10 <meta content=W3C name=DC.publisher> 2.11 - <meta content="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/ED-css3-exclusions-20120905/" 2.12 + <meta content="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/ED-css3-exclusions-20120913/" 2.13 name=DC.identifier> 2.14 <link href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Copyright" 2.15 rel=DC.rights> 2.16 @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ 2.17 2.18 <h1 id=css-exclusions-module>CSS Exclusions and Shapes Module Level 3</h1> 2.19 2.20 - <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=longstatus-date>Editor's Draft 5 September 2.21 + <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=longstatus-date>Editor's Draft 13 September 2.22 2012</h2> 2.23 2.24 <dl> 2.25 @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ 2.26 2.27 <dd><a 2.28 href="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-exclusions/">http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-exclusions/</a></dd> 2.29 - <!--<dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/ED-css3-exclusions-20120905/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-exclusions-20120905/</a></dd>--> 2.30 + <!--<dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/ED-css3-exclusions-20120913/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-exclusions-20120913/</a></dd>--> 2.31 2.32 <dt>Latest version: 2.33 2.34 @@ -1059,7 +1059,32 @@ 2.35 <p class=short-desc>Is the CSS exclusions processing model incorrect? 2.36 </div> 2.37 </div> 2.38 - 2.39 + </div> 2.40 + 2.41 + <div class=issue> 2.42 + <p>The current draft provides a model for exclusions without a 2.43 + collision-avoidance model. The existing exclusion model in CSS uses 2.44 + floats, which have both exclusion and collision-avoidance behavior. 2.45 + Concerns have been raised that allowing exclusions without collision 2.46 + avoidance could be harmful, particularly with absolutely-positioned 2.47 + elements. Three options should be considered: 2.48 + 2.49 + <p> 2.50 + 2.51 + <ol> 2.52 + <li>Allow exclusions in positioning schemes with no collision avoidance. 2.53 + 2.54 + <li>Disallow exclusions in positioning schemes with no collision 2.55 + avoidance. 2.56 + 2.57 + <li>Define collision-avoidance behavior for positioning schemes without 2.58 + it, and use this behavior by default with exclusions. 2.59 + </ol> 2.60 + 2.61 + <ol></ol> 2.62 + </div> 2.63 + 2.64 + <div class="issue-marker wrapper"> 2.65 <div class=issue-marker data-bug_id=15083 data-bug_status=NEW> <a 2.66 href="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15083">Issue-15083</a> 2.67 2.68 @@ -1069,18 +1094,6 @@ 2.69 </div> 2.70 </div> 2.71 2.72 - <p class=issue> The rules for exclusions order and exclusions on absolutely 2.73 - positioned elements (particularly those with static position) build this 2.74 - exclusions model on top of the absolute positioning model in CSS Level 2, 2.75 - rather than on top of floats, the existing exclusion model in CSS Level 1 2.76 - and 2. The CSS Working Group has not reached consensus on whether it 2.77 - intends to base the new exclusions features in this specification on top 2.78 - of absolute positioning (as these sections of this specification do) or on 2.79 - top of floats. 2.80 - 2.81 - <p class=note> This module does not depend on any particular positioning 2.82 - scheme. 2.83 - 2.84 <h3 id=exclusions-processing-model><span class=secno>3.5. </span>Processing 2.85 model</h3> 2.86 2.87 @@ -2482,10 +2495,10 @@ 2.88 <dt id=CSS3VAL>[CSS3VAL] 2.89 2.90 <dd>HÃ¥kon Wium Lie; Tab Atkins; Elika J. Etemad. <a 2.91 - href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-values-20120308/"><cite>CSS 2.92 - Values and Units Module Level 3.</cite></a> 8 March 2012. W3C Working 2.93 - Draft. (Work in progress.) URL: <a 2.94 - href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-values-20120308/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-values-20120308/</a> 2.95 + href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-values-20120828/"><cite>CSS 2.96 + Values and Units Module Level 3.</cite></a> 28 August 2012. W3C Candidate 2.97 + Recommendation. (Work in progress.) URL: <a 2.98 + href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-values-20120828/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-values-20120828/</a> 2.99 </dd> 2.100 <!----> 2.101