Mercurial > drafts / changeset

     1.1 --- a/css-overflow/Overview.html	Thu Apr 04 16:08:09 2013 -0700
     1.2 +++ b/css-overflow/Overview.html	Thu Apr 04 16:38:16 2013 -0700
     1.3 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
     1.4  
     1.5    <meta content="CSS Overflow Module Level 3" name=dc.title>
     1.6    <meta content=text name=dc.type>
     1.7 -  <meta content=2013-03-29 name=dc.date>
     1.8 +  <meta content=2013-04-04 name=dc.date>
     1.9    <meta content="L. David Baron" name=dc.creator>
    1.10    <meta content=W3C name=dc.publisher>
    1.11    <meta content="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-overflow/" name=dc.identifier>
    1.12 @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
    1.13  
    1.14     <h1>CSS Overflow Module Level 3</h1>
    1.15  
    1.16 -   <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=longstatus-date>Editor's Draft 29 March 2013</h2>
    1.17 +   <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=longstatus-date>Editor's Draft 4 April 2013</h2>
    1.18  
    1.19     <dl>
    1.20      <dt>This version:
    1.21 @@ -601,6 +601,13 @@
    1.22     href="#overflow-x"><code class=property>overflow-x</code></a>’ and ‘<a
    1.23     href="#overflow-y"><code class=property>overflow-y</code></a>’ instead?
    1.24  
    1.25 +  <p class=issue> There are <a
    1.26 +   href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012May/1197.html">discussions</a>
    1.27 +   about how overflow, overflow-style, overflow-x and overflow-y should work
    1.28 +   and interact with each other. Until consensus on this topic is reached, it
    1.29 +   is not completely clear which of these should be used for paged-x |
    1.30 +   paged-y | paged-x-controls | paged-y-controls | fragments
    1.31 +
    1.32    <h2 id=scrolling-overflow><span class=secno>3. </span>Scrolling and hidden
    1.33     overflow</h2>
    1.34  
    1.35 @@ -1438,7 +1445,7 @@
    1.36    <!-- Sorted by label -->
    1.37  
    1.38    <dl class=bibliography>
    1.39 -   <dt style="display: none"><!-- keeps the doc valid if the DL is empty -->
    1.40 +   <dd style="display: none"><!-- keeps the doc valid if the DL is empty -->
    1.41      <!---->
    1.42  
    1.43     <dt id=CSS21>[CSS21]
    1.44 @@ -1536,7 +1543,7 @@
    1.45    <!-- Sorted by label -->
    1.46  
    1.47    <dl class=bibliography>
    1.48 -   <dt style="display: none"><!-- keeps the doc valid if the DL is empty -->
    1.49 +   <dd style="display: none"><!-- keeps the doc valid if the DL is empty -->
    1.50      <!---->
    1.51  
    1.52     <dt id=CSS1>[CSS1]

     2.1 --- a/css-overflow/Overview.src.html	Thu Apr 04 16:08:09 2013 -0700
     2.2 +++ b/css-overflow/Overview.src.html	Thu Apr 04 16:38:16 2013 -0700
     2.3 @@ -425,6 +425,16 @@
     2.4  		'overflow-x' and 'overflow-y' instead?
     2.5  	</p>
     2.6  
     2.7 +	<p class="issue">
     2.8 +		There are <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012May/1197.html">discussions</a>
     2.9 +		about how overflow, overflow-style, overflow-x and overflow-y
    2.10 +		should work and interact with each other.
    2.11 +		Until consensus on this topic is reached,
    2.12 +		it is not completely clear which of these
    2.13 +		should be used for
    2.14 +		paged-x | paged-y | paged-x-controls | paged-y-controls | fragments
    2.15 +	</p>
    2.16 +
    2.17  <h2 id="scrolling-overflow">Scrolling and hidden overflow</h2>
    2.18  
    2.19  	<p class="issue">