[css3-conditional] Fill in more of disposition of comments.

Thu, 07 Feb 2013 14:03:18 -0800

author
L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
date
Thu, 07 Feb 2013 14:03:18 -0800
changeset 7386
4bce5575a484
parent 7385
c9240e1f9f7a
child 7387
7dace721dff3

[css3-conditional] Fill in more of disposition of comments.

css3-conditional/doc-20121213-LCWD.txt file | annotate | diff | comparison | revisions
     1.1 --- a/css3-conditional/doc-20121213-LCWD.txt	Thu Feb 07 00:53:04 2013 -0800
     1.2 +++ b/css3-conditional/doc-20121213-LCWD.txt	Thu Feb 07 14:03:18 2013 -0800
     1.3 @@ -3,31 +3,49 @@
     1.4  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0224.html
     1.5  improve examples
     1.6  Resolution: Editorial, but will improve examples.
     1.7 +Fixed in: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/06244e910e27
     1.8 +Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0231.html
     1.9  
    1.10  Issue 2:
    1.11  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0277.html
    1.12  @supports not( without space
    1.13  Resolution: require spaces, per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0330.html
    1.14 +Fixed in: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/34b185ae3bac
    1.15 +Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0232.html
    1.16  
    1.17  Issue 3:
    1.18  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0070.html
    1.19  What does @supports return when the OS prevents the support?
    1.20  Resolution: user and system preferences do not affect what @supports returns; it's only about UA capabilities, and must be the same as declaration fallback.  So add a clarification of this, but no substantive change.  (Resolved 2013-02-06, AM I.)
    1.21 +Fixed in: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/6e5d9a1539bd
    1.22 +Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0233.html
    1.23  
    1.24  Issue 4:
    1.25  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0436.html
    1.26  @supports all
    1.27  Reply: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0442.html
    1.28  Resolution: no change, per rationale in reply  (Resolved 2013-02-06, AM I.)
    1.29 +Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0234.html
    1.30  
    1.31  Issue 5:
    1.32 -Issue in spec about insertRule, followup to
    1.33 -http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0329.html
    1.34 -http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0102.html
    1.35 +Issue in spec about insertRule, followup to Issue 7
    1.36 +also raised as first issue in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html
    1.37 +Proposed resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0229.html
    1.38 +Florian agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html
    1.39  
    1.40 -Issue 6:
    1.41 +Issue 6 (prior to LC publication):
    1.42  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0014.html
    1.43  review of the new grammar for @supports
    1.44 -maybe addressed by: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0239.html
    1.45 +Addressed by: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0239.html
    1.46 +Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html
    1.47 +Resolution: Already fixed prior to LC; commenter agrees.
    1.48  
    1.49 +Issue 7 (prior to LC publication):
    1.50 +Raised in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0329.html
    1.51 +Addressed by: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0102.html
    1.52 +(3 points accepted, 1 rejected)
    1.53 +No response from commenter.
    1.54  
    1.55 +Issue 8:
    1.56 +second issue in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html
    1.57 +serialization of supports_rule

mercurial