Thu, 07 Feb 2013 14:03:18 -0800
[css3-conditional] Fill in more of disposition of comments.
css3-conditional/doc-20121213-LCWD.txt | file | annotate | diff | comparison | revisions |
1.1 --- a/css3-conditional/doc-20121213-LCWD.txt Thu Feb 07 00:53:04 2013 -0800 1.2 +++ b/css3-conditional/doc-20121213-LCWD.txt Thu Feb 07 14:03:18 2013 -0800 1.3 @@ -3,31 +3,49 @@ 1.4 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0224.html 1.5 improve examples 1.6 Resolution: Editorial, but will improve examples. 1.7 +Fixed in: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/06244e910e27 1.8 +Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0231.html 1.9 1.10 Issue 2: 1.11 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0277.html 1.12 @supports not( without space 1.13 Resolution: require spaces, per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0330.html 1.14 +Fixed in: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/34b185ae3bac 1.15 +Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0232.html 1.16 1.17 Issue 3: 1.18 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0070.html 1.19 What does @supports return when the OS prevents the support? 1.20 Resolution: user and system preferences do not affect what @supports returns; it's only about UA capabilities, and must be the same as declaration fallback. So add a clarification of this, but no substantive change. (Resolved 2013-02-06, AM I.) 1.21 +Fixed in: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/6e5d9a1539bd 1.22 +Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0233.html 1.23 1.24 Issue 4: 1.25 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0436.html 1.26 @supports all 1.27 Reply: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0442.html 1.28 Resolution: no change, per rationale in reply (Resolved 2013-02-06, AM I.) 1.29 +Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0234.html 1.30 1.31 Issue 5: 1.32 -Issue in spec about insertRule, followup to 1.33 -http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0329.html 1.34 -http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0102.html 1.35 +Issue in spec about insertRule, followup to Issue 7 1.36 +also raised as first issue in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html 1.37 +Proposed resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0229.html 1.38 +Florian agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html 1.39 1.40 -Issue 6: 1.41 +Issue 6 (prior to LC publication): 1.42 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0014.html 1.43 review of the new grammar for @supports 1.44 -maybe addressed by: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0239.html 1.45 +Addressed by: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0239.html 1.46 +Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html 1.47 +Resolution: Already fixed prior to LC; commenter agrees. 1.48 1.49 +Issue 7 (prior to LC publication): 1.50 +Raised in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0329.html 1.51 +Addressed by: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0102.html 1.52 +(3 points accepted, 1 rejected) 1.53 +No response from commenter. 1.54 1.55 +Issue 8: 1.56 +second issue in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html 1.57 +serialization of supports_rule