# HG changeset patch
# User Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
# Date 1347568216 25200
# Node ID d238b1e9c4accd06deba45792b452288f8661127
# Parent  e92b5e2ae5add082d900c1a0c545ce94e0b16652
[css3-exclusions] re-word issue 1

diff -r e92b5e2ae5ad -r d238b1e9c4ac css3-exclusions/Exclusions.src.html
--- a/css3-exclusions/Exclusions.src.html	Thu Sep 13 13:22:46 2012 -0700
+++ b/css3-exclusions/Exclusions.src.html	Thu Sep 13 13:30:16 2012 -0700
@@ -709,8 +709,31 @@
         <div class="issue-details">
             <p class="short-desc">Is the CSS exclusions processing model incorrect?</p>
         </div>
-     </div>
+    </div>
+    </div>
 
+    <div class="issue">
+
+        <p>The current draft provides a model for exclusions
+        without a collision-avoidance model. 
+        The existing exclusion model in CSS uses floats, 
+        which have both exclusion and collision-avoidance behavior. 
+        Concerns have been raised that allowing exclusions 
+        without collision avoidance could be harmful, 
+        particularly with absolutely-positioned elements. 
+        Three options should be considered:<p>
+        <ol>
+            <li>Allow exclusions in positioning schemes 
+                with no collision avoidance.</li>
+            <li>Disallow exclusions in positioning schemes 
+                with no collision avoidance.</li>
+            <li>Define collision-avoidance behavior 
+                for positioning schemes without it, 
+                and use this behavior by default with exclusions.</li>
+        <ol>
+    </div>
+
+    <div class="issue-marker wrapper">
     <div class="issue-marker" data-bug_id="15083" data-bug_status="NEW">
         <a href="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15083">Issue-15083</a>
         <div class="issue-details">
@@ -718,20 +741,6 @@
         </div>
     </div>
     </div>
-
-    <p class="issue">
-        The rules for exclusions order and exclusions on absolutely positioned elements
-        (particularly those with static position) build this exclusions model on top of
-        the absolute positioning model in CSS Level 2, rather than on top of floats, the
-        existing exclusion model in CSS Level 1 and 2. The CSS Working Group has not reached
-        consensus on whether it intends to base the new exclusions features in this specification
-        on top of absolute positioning (as these sections of this specification do) or on
-        top of floats.
-    </p>
-
-    <p class="note">
-        This module does not depend on any particular positioning scheme.
-    </p>
     
         <h3 id="exclusions-processing-model">Processing model</h3>
         
diff -r e92b5e2ae5ad -r d238b1e9c4ac css3-exclusions/Overview.html
--- a/css3-exclusions/Overview.html	Thu Sep 13 13:22:46 2012 -0700
+++ b/css3-exclusions/Overview.html	Thu Sep 13 13:30:16 2012 -0700
@@ -10,10 +10,10 @@
   <link href="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" rel=schema.DC>
   <meta content="CSS Exclusions and Shapes Module Level 3" name=DC.title>
   <meta content=text name=DC.type>
-  <meta content=2012-09-05 name=DC.issued>
+  <meta content=2012-09-13 name=DC.issued>
   <meta content="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-exclusions/" name=DC.creator>
   <meta content=W3C name=DC.publisher>
-  <meta content="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/ED-css3-exclusions-20120905/"
+  <meta content="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/ED-css3-exclusions-20120913/"
    name=DC.identifier>
   <link href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Copyright"
    rel=DC.rights>
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
 
    <h1 id=css-exclusions-module>CSS Exclusions and Shapes Module Level 3</h1>
 
-   <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=longstatus-date>Editor's Draft 5 September
+   <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=longstatus-date>Editor's Draft 13 September
     2012</h2>
 
    <dl>
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
 
     <dd><a
      href="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-exclusions/">http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-exclusions/</a></dd>
-    <!--<dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/ED-css3-exclusions-20120905/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-exclusions-20120905/</a></dd>-->
+    <!--<dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/ED-css3-exclusions-20120913/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-exclusions-20120913/</a></dd>-->
 
     <dt>Latest version:
 
@@ -1059,7 +1059,32 @@
      <p class=short-desc>Is the CSS exclusions processing model incorrect?
     </div>
    </div>
-
+  </div>
+
+  <div class=issue>
+   <p>The current draft provides a model for exclusions without a
+    collision-avoidance model. The existing exclusion model in CSS uses
+    floats, which have both exclusion and collision-avoidance behavior.
+    Concerns have been raised that allowing exclusions without collision
+    avoidance could be harmful, particularly with absolutely-positioned
+    elements. Three options should be considered:
+
+   <p>
+
+   <ol>
+    <li>Allow exclusions in positioning schemes with no collision avoidance.
+
+    <li>Disallow exclusions in positioning schemes with no collision
+     avoidance.
+
+    <li>Define collision-avoidance behavior for positioning schemes without
+     it, and use this behavior by default with exclusions.
+   </ol>
+
+   <ol></ol>
+  </div>
+
+  <div class="issue-marker wrapper">
    <div class=issue-marker data-bug_id=15083 data-bug_status=NEW> <a
     href="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15083">Issue-15083</a>
 
@@ -1069,18 +1094,6 @@
    </div>
   </div>
 
-  <p class=issue> The rules for exclusions order and exclusions on absolutely
-   positioned elements (particularly those with static position) build this
-   exclusions model on top of the absolute positioning model in CSS Level 2,
-   rather than on top of floats, the existing exclusion model in CSS Level 1
-   and 2. The CSS Working Group has not reached consensus on whether it
-   intends to base the new exclusions features in this specification on top
-   of absolute positioning (as these sections of this specification do) or on
-   top of floats.
-
-  <p class=note> This module does not depend on any particular positioning
-   scheme.
-
   <h3 id=exclusions-processing-model><span class=secno>3.5. </span>Processing
    model</h3>
 
@@ -2482,10 +2495,10 @@
    <dt id=CSS3VAL>[CSS3VAL]
 
    <dd>Håkon Wium Lie; Tab Atkins; Elika J. Etemad. <a
-    href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-values-20120308/"><cite>CSS
-    Values and Units Module Level 3.</cite></a> 8 March 2012. W3C Working
-    Draft. (Work in progress.) URL: <a
-    href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-values-20120308/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-values-20120308/</a>
+    href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-values-20120828/"><cite>CSS
+    Values and Units Module Level 3.</cite></a> 28 August 2012. W3C Candidate
+    Recommendation. (Work in progress.) URL: <a
+    href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-values-20120828/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-values-20120828/</a>
    </dd>
    <!---->