1.1 --- a/css3-exclusions/Overview.html Thu Sep 13 13:22:46 2012 -0700
1.2 +++ b/css3-exclusions/Overview.html Thu Sep 13 13:30:16 2012 -0700
1.3 @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@
1.4 <link href="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" rel=schema.DC>
1.5 <meta content="CSS Exclusions and Shapes Module Level 3" name=DC.title>
1.6 <meta content=text name=DC.type>
1.7 - <meta content=2012-09-05 name=DC.issued>
1.8 + <meta content=2012-09-13 name=DC.issued>
1.9 <meta content="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-exclusions/" name=DC.creator>
1.10 <meta content=W3C name=DC.publisher>
1.11 - <meta content="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/ED-css3-exclusions-20120905/"
1.12 + <meta content="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/ED-css3-exclusions-20120913/"
1.13 name=DC.identifier>
1.14 <link href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Copyright"
1.15 rel=DC.rights>
1.16 @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
1.17
1.18 <h1 id=css-exclusions-module>CSS Exclusions and Shapes Module Level 3</h1>
1.19
1.20 - <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=longstatus-date>Editor's Draft 5 September
1.21 + <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=longstatus-date>Editor's Draft 13 September
1.22 2012</h2>
1.23
1.24 <dl>
1.25 @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
1.26
1.27 <dd><a
1.28 href="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-exclusions/">http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-exclusions/</a></dd>
1.29 - <!--<dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/ED-css3-exclusions-20120905/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-exclusions-20120905/</a></dd>-->
1.30 + <!--<dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/ED-css3-exclusions-20120913/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-exclusions-20120913/</a></dd>-->
1.31
1.32 <dt>Latest version:
1.33
1.34 @@ -1059,7 +1059,32 @@
1.35 <p class=short-desc>Is the CSS exclusions processing model incorrect?
1.36 </div>
1.37 </div>
1.38 -
1.39 + </div>
1.40 +
1.41 + <div class=issue>
1.42 + <p>The current draft provides a model for exclusions without a
1.43 + collision-avoidance model. The existing exclusion model in CSS uses
1.44 + floats, which have both exclusion and collision-avoidance behavior.
1.45 + Concerns have been raised that allowing exclusions without collision
1.46 + avoidance could be harmful, particularly with absolutely-positioned
1.47 + elements. Three options should be considered:
1.48 +
1.49 + <p>
1.50 +
1.51 + <ol>
1.52 + <li>Allow exclusions in positioning schemes with no collision avoidance.
1.53 +
1.54 + <li>Disallow exclusions in positioning schemes with no collision
1.55 + avoidance.
1.56 +
1.57 + <li>Define collision-avoidance behavior for positioning schemes without
1.58 + it, and use this behavior by default with exclusions.
1.59 + </ol>
1.60 +
1.61 + <ol></ol>
1.62 + </div>
1.63 +
1.64 + <div class="issue-marker wrapper">
1.65 <div class=issue-marker data-bug_id=15083 data-bug_status=NEW> <a
1.66 href="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15083">Issue-15083</a>
1.67
1.68 @@ -1069,18 +1094,6 @@
1.69 </div>
1.70 </div>
1.71
1.72 - <p class=issue> The rules for exclusions order and exclusions on absolutely
1.73 - positioned elements (particularly those with static position) build this
1.74 - exclusions model on top of the absolute positioning model in CSS Level 2,
1.75 - rather than on top of floats, the existing exclusion model in CSS Level 1
1.76 - and 2. The CSS Working Group has not reached consensus on whether it
1.77 - intends to base the new exclusions features in this specification on top
1.78 - of absolute positioning (as these sections of this specification do) or on
1.79 - top of floats.
1.80 -
1.81 - <p class=note> This module does not depend on any particular positioning
1.82 - scheme.
1.83 -
1.84 <h3 id=exclusions-processing-model><span class=secno>3.5. </span>Processing
1.85 model</h3>
1.86
1.87 @@ -2482,10 +2495,10 @@
1.88 <dt id=CSS3VAL>[CSS3VAL]
1.89
1.90 <dd>Håkon Wium Lie; Tab Atkins; Elika J. Etemad. <a
1.91 - href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-values-20120308/"><cite>CSS
1.92 - Values and Units Module Level 3.</cite></a> 8 March 2012. W3C Working
1.93 - Draft. (Work in progress.) URL: <a
1.94 - href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-values-20120308/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-values-20120308/</a>
1.95 + href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-values-20120828/"><cite>CSS
1.96 + Values and Units Module Level 3.</cite></a> 28 August 2012. W3C Candidate
1.97 + Recommendation. (Work in progress.) URL: <a
1.98 + href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-values-20120828/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-values-20120828/</a>
1.99 </dd>
1.100 <!---->
1.101
