1.1 --- a/css3-conditional/Overview.src.html Thu Oct 11 22:57:09 2012 -0700 1.2 +++ b/css3-conditional/Overview.src.html Thu Oct 11 23:43:33 2012 -0700 1.3 @@ -89,8 +89,6 @@ 1.4 <li>The '@supports' rule is at risk; if interoperable 1.5 implementations are not found, it may be removed to advance the other 1.6 features in this specification to Proposed Recommendation.</li> 1.7 - 1.8 - <li>The support for functions inside of ''@supports'' is at risk.</li> 1.9 </ul> 1.10 1.11 <!-- 1.12 @@ -444,8 +442,11 @@ 1.13 1.14 <dt>supports_declaration_condition</dt> 1.15 <dd> 1.16 - The result is whether the CSS processor <a 1.17 - href="#support-definition">supports</a> the declaration or function. 1.18 + The result is false if this corresponds to a functional notation; 1.19 + otherwise, the result is whether the CSS processor <a 1.20 + href="#support-definition">supports</a> the declaration 1.21 + within the parentheses. 1.22 + <span class="note">Note that future levels may define functions that can evaluate to true.</span> 1.23 </dd> 1.24 </dl> 1.25 1.26 @@ -582,15 +583,6 @@ 1.27 then it <strong>must not</strong> 1.28 accept the declaration or claim support for it.</p> 1.29 1.30 -<p>A CSS processor is considered to <i>support</i> a function 1.31 -(consisting of a function name and arguments) 1.32 -if it accepts that function 1.33 -(rather than discarding it as a parse error). 1.34 -If a processor does not implement, with a usable level of support, 1.35 -the value given, 1.36 -then it <strong>must not</strong> 1.37 -accept the function or claim support for it.</p> 1.38 - 1.39 <p>These rules (and the equivalence between them) allow 1.40 authors to use fallback (either in the [[CSS1]] sense of declarations 1.41 that are overridden by later declarations or with the new capabilities 1.42 @@ -1116,6 +1108,8 @@ 1.43 <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-conditional-20120911/">11 September 2012 Working Draft</a>: 1.44 1.45 <ul> 1.46 + <li>Allow functional notation in ''@supports'' queries to be valid (to allow for future extensions), 1.47 + but treat such notations as always being false. 1.48 <li>Corrected the grammar as follows: 1.49 <pre> 1.50 - : SUPPORTS_SYM S+ supports_condition group_rule_body