--- a/tr.html Tue Sep 17 12:31:51 2013 -0400
+++ b/tr.html Tue Sep 17 12:34:01 2013 -0400
@@ -37,11 +37,11 @@
4.1
of the W3C Patent Policy</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>]
for information about the policy implications of the Candidate
Recommendation. </p>
<p>Possible next steps:</p>
<ul>
<li>Return to <a href="#hb-wd">Heartbeat Working Draft</a></li>
<li>Return to <a href="#last-call">Last Call Candidate Recommendation</a></li>
<li><a href="#rec-publication">Request Recommendation status</a> (The
expected next step)</li>
<li><a href="#tr-end">Working Group Note</a></li>
</ul>
<p class="new">If there are any <a href="#substantive-change">substantive
changes</a> or <a href="#substantive-correction">substantive
corrections</a> made to a Last Call Candidate Recommendation other than
to remove features explicitly identified as "at risk", the Working Group <em
class="rfc2119">must</em>
repeat the full process of publication as a Last Call Candidate
Recommendation before the Working Group can request Recommendation status.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
Committee</a> representatives <em class="rfc2119">may</em> <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/acreview.html#ACAppeal">appeal</a>
the decision to advance the technical report.</p>
<h4>7.4.5 <a name="rec-publication" id="rec-publication">Publication of a
W3C Recommendation</a></h4>
<h5><a name="lcrec-publication" id="lcrec-publication">Publishing a Last
Call Candidate Recommendation as a W3C Recommendation</a></h5>
<p>To publish a Last Call Candidate Recommendation as a W3C Recommendation,
a Working Group</p>
<ul>
<li class="new"><em class="rfc2119">must</em> republish the document,
identifying it as the basis of a Request for Recommendation.</li>
<li><span class="changed"><em class="rfc2119">must</em> show that
independent implementations of the specification are extremely likely
to be highly interoperable. </span><span class="from">(said
preferably should be two interoperable implementations...)</span> <span
class="issue">This
- requirement is liable to change. It is tracked in <a href="https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/26">ISSUE-26</a>
and <a href="https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/27">ISSUE-27</a></span></li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> show that the document has been <a href="#wide-review">widely
- reviewed</a></li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> show that all issues raised during the
Last Call Candidate Recommendation review period have been formally
addressed.</li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">must </em>identify any substantive issues raised
since the close of the review period by parties other than Advisory
Committee representatives <span class="from">(was in 7.3)</span></li>
<li class="new"><em class="rfc2119">must</em> document how the testing and
implementation requirements identified as part of the transition to Last
Call Candidate Recommendation have been met.</li>
<li class="new"><em class="rfc2119">must</em> identify where errata are
tracked.</li>
<li class="new"><em class="rfc2119">should</em> document known
implementation.</li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">may</em> remove features identified in the Last
Call Candidate Recommendation document as "at risk" without repeating
the transition to Last Call Candidate Recommendation. <span class="from">(was
+ requirement is liable to change. It is tracked in <a href="https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/26">ISSUE-26</a>
and <a href="https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/27">ISSUE-27</a></span></li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> show that the document has received <a
href="#wide-review">wide
+ review</a></li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> show that all issues raised during the
Last Call Candidate Recommendation review period have been formally
addressed.</li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">must </em>identify any substantive issues raised
since the close of the review period by parties other than Advisory
Committee representatives <span class="from">(was in 7.3)</span></li>
<li class="new"><em class="rfc2119">must</em> document how the testing and
implementation requirements identified as part of the transition to Last
Call Candidate Recommendation have been met.</li>
<li class="new"><em class="rfc2119">must</em> identify where errata are
tracked.</li>
<li class="new"><em class="rfc2119">should</em> document known
implementation.</li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">may</em> remove features identified in the Last
Call Candidate Recommendation document as "at risk" without repeating
the transition to Last Call Candidate Recommendation. <span class="from">(was
in 7.4.3)</span> </li>
</ul>
<p>The Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em> announce the provisional
approval of a Request for publication of a W3C Recommendation to the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
Committee</a>. <span class="new">The Director<em class="rfc2119">should
not</em> provisionally approve a Request for publication of a W3C
Recommendation less than 35 days after the publication of the Last Call
Candidate Recommendation on which is it based. [editor's note - this is
to allow for the patent policy exclusion period to expire]</span></p>
<h5 id="rec-edited">Publishing an Edited Recommendation (See also <a href="#rec-modify">Modifying
- a Recommendation</a> below)</h5>
<p>To publish an Edited Recommendation as a W3C Recommendation, a Working
Group</p>
<ul class="new">
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> republish the document, identifying it
as the basis of a Request for Recommendation.</li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> show that the document has been
available for effective public review.</li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">should</em> document known implementation.</li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">should</em> address all errata.</li>
</ul>
<h5>For all W3C Recommendations</h5>
<p>The Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em> announce the provisional
approval of a Request for publication of a W3C Recommendation to the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
+ a Recommendation</a> below)</h5>
<p>To publish an Edited Recommendation as a W3C Recommendation, a Working
Group</p>
<ul class="new">
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> republish the document, identifying it
as the basis of a Request for Recommendation.</li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> show that the document has received <a
href="#wide-review">wide
review</a></li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">should</em> document known implementation.</li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">should</em> address all errata.</li>
</ul>
<h5>For all W3C Recommendations</h5>
<p>The Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em> announce the provisional
approval of a Request for publication of a W3C Recommendation to the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
Committee</a>.</p>
<p class="changed">The Advisory Committee review of the technical report <em
class="rfc2119">must</em>
continue at least 28 days after the announcement of provisional approval
to publish the Edited Recommendation as a W3C Recommendation. <span class="from">(was
7.4.4)</span> </p>
<p>If there was any <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#def-Dissent"
rel="glossary"
title="Definition of Dissent"><span
class="dfn-instance">dissent</span></a>
in Advisory Committee reviews, the director <span class="new"><em class="rfc2119">must</em>
publish the substantive content of the dissent to W3C <strong>and the
general public</strong></span> and <em class="rfc2119">must</em> <a
href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#formal-address">formally
address</a> the comment <span class="new">at least 14 days before
publication as a W3C Recommendation</span>. In this case the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
Patent Policy</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>]
and in particular <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy#sec-Requirements">section
5</a> (bullet 10) and <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy#sec-PAG-conclude">section
7.5</a>. <span class="changed">A Working Group </span><span class="changed"><em
class="rfc2119">may</em>
request the director to rescind a Recommendation which was a
deliverable, or the Director </span><span class="changed"><em class="rfc2119">may</em>
directly propose to rescind a Recommendation. </span><span class="from">(was
- "the Director calls for review when satisfied that [it is necessary]")</span></p>
<p>To deprecate <em>part</em> of a Recommendation, W3C follows the process
for <a href="#rec-modify">modifying a Recommendation</a>.</p>
<p>Once W3C has published a Rescinded Recommendation, future W3C technical
reports <em class="rfc2119">must not</em> include normative references to
that technical report.</p>
<p>To propose rescinding a W3C Recommendation, a Working Group or the
Director</p>
<ul>
<li class="new"><em class="rfc2119">must</em> publish rationale for
rescinding the Recommendation.</li>
<li class="new"><em class="rfc2119">should</em> document known
implementation.</li>
</ul>
<p>In addition a Working Group proposing to rescind</p>
<ul class="new">
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> show that the request to rescind has
been available for effective public review</li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">should</em> show that the request to rescind is
based on public comment</li>
</ul>
<p>In addition the Director, if proposing to rescind</p>
<ul>
<li class="new"><em class="rfc2119">must</em> show that the request to
rescind is based on public comment</li>
</ul>
<p>The Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em> announce the proposal to
rescind a W3C Recommendation to other W3C groups, the public, and the <a
href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
+ "the Director calls for review when satisfied that [it is necessary]")</span></p>
<p>To deprecate <em>part</em> of a Recommendation, W3C follows the process
for <a href="#rec-modify">modifying a Recommendation</a>.</p>
<p>Once W3C has published a Rescinded Recommendation, future W3C technical
reports <em class="rfc2119">must not</em> include normative references to
that technical report.</p>
<p>To propose rescinding a W3C Recommendation, a Working Group or the
Director</p>
<ul>
<li class="new"><em class="rfc2119">must</em> publish rationale for
rescinding the Recommendation.</li>
<li class="new"><em class="rfc2119">should</em> document known
implementation.</li>
</ul>
<p>In addition a Working Group proposing to rescind</p>
<ul class="new">
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> show that the request to rescind has
received <a href="#wide-review">wide review</a></li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">should</em> show that the request to rescind is
based on public comment</li>
</ul>
<p>In addition the Director, if proposing to rescind</p>
<ul>
<li class="new"><em class="rfc2119">must</em> show that the request to
rescind is based on public comment</li>
</ul>
<p>The Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em> announce the proposal to
rescind a W3C Recommendation to other W3C groups, the public, and the <a
href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
Committee</a>. The announcement <em class="rfc2119">must</em>:</p>
<ol>
<li>indicate that this is a Proposal to Rescind a Recommendation</li>
<li>specify the deadline for review comments, which <em class="rfc2119">must</em>
be at least <span class="time-interval">four weeks after publication </span></li>
<li>identify known dependencies and solicit review from all dependent
Working Groups;</li>
<li>solicit public review.</li>
</ol>
<p>If there was any <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#def-Dissent"
rel="glossary"
title="Definition of Dissent"><span
class="dfn-instance">dissent</span></a>
in Advisory Committee reviews, the director <span class="new"><em class="rfc2119">must</em>
publish the substantive content of the dissent to W3C <strong>and the
public</strong></span>, and <em class="rfc2119">must</em> <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#formal-address">formally
address</a> the comment <span class="new">at least 14 days before
publication</span> as a Rescinded Recommendation. In this case the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
Committee</a> <em class="rfc2119">may</em> <a href="#ACAppeal">appeal</a>
the decision.</p>
<h3>Good practices</h3>
<p>Refer to <a href="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/Transitions">"How to
Organize a Recommendation Track Transition"</a> in the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Guide/">Member