Note that FPWD approval is pretty straightforward, while other transistions normally require a meeting and review
authorcharles
Fri, 18 Oct 2013 02:02:38 +0200
changeset 41 23a28177f938
parent 40 1ff44ce92183
child 42 563e36863a36
Note that FPWD approval is pretty straightforward, while other transistions normally require a meeting and review
See Ivan Herman's review: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2013Oct/0037.html
tr.html
--- a/tr.html	Fri Oct 18 01:57:56 2013 +0200
+++ b/tr.html	Fri Oct 18 02:02:38 2013 +0200
@@ -372,6 +372,12 @@
       <li class="new"><em class="rfc2119">should</em> document known
         implementation.</li>
     </ul>
+    <p>Because the requirements for First Public Working Drafts are fairly
+      mechanical approval is normally fairly automatic, whereas for later stages
+      there is generally a formal review meeting to ensure the requirements have
+      been met before Director's approval is given.</p>
+    <ul>
+    </ul>
     <h4 id="substantive-change">7.2.1 Substantive Change</h4>
     <p> A <dfn>substantive change</dfn> (whether deletion, inclusion, or other
       modification) is one where someone could reasonably expect that making the