tr.html
changeset 97 18cca5e3bf7a
parent 95 881ab929e726
child 101 ac2545a96f7c
--- a/tr.html	Wed Mar 19 13:18:55 2014 +0100
+++ b/tr.html	Wed Mar 19 13:38:46 2014 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 <!DOCTYPE html>
-<html>
+<html lang="en">
   <head>
     <meta charset="UTF-8">
     <title>A Rec-track Process Draft Proposal</title>
@@ -30,14 +30,14 @@
     <h1>W3C Process Document</h1>
     <h2 id="Reports">7 W3C Technical Report Development Process</h2>
     <p>The W3C technical report development process is the set of steps and
-      requirements followed by W3C <a href="groups#GroupsWG">Working
-        Groups</a> to standardize Web technology. The W3C technical report
-      development process is designed to </p>
+      requirements followed by W3C <a href="groups#GroupsWG">Working Groups</a>
+      to standardize Web technology. The W3C technical report development
+      process is designed to </p>
     <ul>
       <li>support multiple specification development methodologies</li>
-      <li>maximize <a href="policies.html#def-consensus"
-          rel="glossary" title="Definition of Consensus"><span class="dfn-instance">consensus</span></a>
-        about the content of stable technical reports</li>
+      <li>maximize <a href="policies.html#def-consensus" rel="glossary" title="Definition of Consensus"><span
+            class="dfn-instance">consensus</span></a> about the content of
+        stable technical reports</li>
       <li>ensure high technical and editorial quality</li>
       <li>promote consistency among specifications</li>
       <li>facilitate royalty-free, interoperable implementations of Web
@@ -46,8 +46,7 @@
     </ul>
     <p>See also the licensing goals for W3C Recommendations in <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy#sec-Licensing">section
         2</a> of the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C
-        Patent Policy</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>].
-      </p>
+        Patent Policy</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>]. </p>
     <h3>Table of Contents</h3>
     <ul id="mozToc">
       <li><a href="#rec-advance">7.1 W3C Technical Reports</a>
@@ -195,10 +194,10 @@
       in maturity level, requiring a Working Group to conduct further work, and
       <em class="rfc2119">may</em> require the specification to return to a
       lower <a href="#maturity-level">maturity level</a>. The Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em>
-      inform the <a href="organization.html#AC">Advisory
-        Committee</a> and Working Group Chairs when a Working Group's request
-      for a specification to advance in maturity level is declined and the
-      specification is returned to a Working Group for further work.</p>
+      inform the <a href="organization.html#AC">Advisory Committee</a> and
+      Working Group Chairs when a Working Group's request for a specification to
+      advance in maturity level is declined and the specification is returned to
+      a Working Group for further work.</p>
     <h4 id="maturity-levels">7.1.2 Maturity Levels</h4>
     <dl>
       <dt id="RecsWD">Working Draft (WD)</dt>
@@ -227,8 +226,8 @@
       </dd>
       <dd class="new"><strong>Note:</strong> Candidate Recommendation is the
         state referred to in the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C
-          Patent Policy</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>]
-        as "Last Call Working Draft"</dd>
+          Patent Policy</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>] as
+        "Last Call Working Draft"</dd>
       <dd><strong>Note:</strong> Candidate Recommendations are expected to be
         acceptable as Recommendations. Announcement of a different next step <em
           class="rfc2119">should</em> include the reasons why the change in
@@ -321,8 +320,7 @@
           address</a> all issues raised about the document since the previous
         maturity level.</li>
       <li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> provide public documentation of any <a
-          href="policies.html#FormalObjection">Formal
-          Objections</a>.</li>
+          href="policies.html#FormalObjection">Formal Objections</a>.</li>
       <li><span class="rfc2119">should</span> provide public documentation of
         changes that are not substantive.</li>
       <li><em class="rfc2119">should</em> report which, if any, of the Working
@@ -482,9 +480,9 @@
     <p>Work on a technical report <em class="rfc2119">may</em> cease at any
       time. Work <em class="rfc2119 new">should</em> cease if W3C or a Working
       Group determines that it cannot productively carry the work any further.
-      If the Director <a href="groups.html#GeneralTermination">closes
-        a Working Group</a> W3C <em class="rfc2119">must </em> publish any
-      unfinished specifications on the Recommendation track as <a href="#Note">Working
+      If the Director <a href="groups.html#GeneralTermination">closes a Working
+        Group</a> W3C <em class="rfc2119">must </em> publish any unfinished
+      specifications on the Recommendation track as <a href="#Note">Working
         Group Notes</a>. If a Working group decides, or the Director requires,
       the Working Group to discontinue work on a technical report before
       completion, the Working Group <em class="rfc2119">should</em> publish the
@@ -532,9 +530,9 @@
         next step)</li>
       <li><a href="#Note">Working Group Note</a></li>
     </ul>
-    <p>If there was any <a href="policies.html#def-Dissent"
-        rel="glossary" title="Definition of Dissent"><span class="dfn-instance">dissent</span></a>&nbsp;to
-      the Working Group decision to request advancement <a href="organization.html#AC">Advisory
+    <p>If there was any <a href="policies.html#def-Dissent" rel="glossary" title="Definition of Dissent"><span
+          class="dfn-instance">dissent</span></a>&nbsp;to the Working Group
+      decision to request advancement <a href="organization.html#AC">Advisory
         Committee</a> representatives <em class="rfc2119">may</em> <a href="acreview.html#ACAppeal">appeal</a>
       the decision to advance the technical report.</p>
     <h4 id="revised-cr">7.4.1 Revising a Candidate Recommendation</h4>
@@ -545,8 +543,8 @@
       Recommendation. This is because substantive changes will generally require
       a new Exclusion Opportunity per <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy/#sec-Exclusion">section
         4</a> of the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C
-        Patent Policy</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>].
-      Note that approval is <em>expected</em> to be fairly simple compared to
+        Patent Policy</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>]. Note
+      that approval is <em>expected</em> to be fairly simple compared to
       getting approval for a transition to Candidate Recommendation.</p>
     <p>In addition the Working Group:</p>
     <ul>
@@ -591,8 +589,7 @@
       <li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> show that all issues raised during the
         Candidate Recommendation review period other than by Advisory Committee
         representatives acting in their formal AC representative role have been
-        <a href="policies.html#formal-address">formally
-          addressed</a>,</li>
+        <a href="policies.html#formal-address">formally addressed</a>,</li>
       <li><em class="rfc2119">must </em>identify any substantive issues raised
         since the close of the Candidate Recommendation review period by parties
         other than Advisory Committee representatives acting in their formal AC
@@ -604,8 +601,8 @@
     <p>The Director:</p>
     <ul>
       <li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> announce the publication of a Proposed
-        Recommendation to the <a href="organization.html#AC">Advisory
-          Committee</a>, and</li>
+        Recommendation to the <a href="organization.html#AC">Advisory Committee</a>,
+        and</li>
       <li><span><em class="rfc2119">may</em> approve a Proposed Recommendation
           with minimal implementation experience where there is a compelling
           reason to do so. In such a case, the Director <em class="rfc2119">should</em>
@@ -639,11 +636,11 @@
       <li>A Recommendation <em class="rfc2119">must not</em> include any
         substantive changes from the Proposed Recommendation on which it is
         based.</li>
-      <li>If there was any <a href="policies.html#def-Dissent"
-          rel="glossary" title="Definition of Dissent"><span class="dfn-instance">dissent</span></a>
-        in Advisory Committee reviews, the Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em>
-        publish the substantive content of the dissent to W3C and the general
-        public, and <em class="rfc2119">must</em> <a href="policies.html#formal-address">formally
+      <li>If there was any <a href="policies.html#def-Dissent" rel="glossary" title="Definition of Dissent"><span
+            class="dfn-instance">dissent</span></a> in Advisory Committee
+        reviews, the Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em> publish the
+        substantive content of the dissent to W3C and the general public, and <em
+          class="rfc2119">must</em> <a href="policies.html#formal-address">formally
           address</a> the comment at least 14 days before publication as a W3C
         Recommendation. In this case the <a href="organization.html#AC">Advisory
           Committee</a> <em class="rfc2119">may</em> <a href="acreview.html#ACAppeal">appeal</a>
@@ -733,16 +730,15 @@
         level the specification had before publication as a Note</li>
     </ul>
     <p>The <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C Patent
-        Policy</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>]
-      does not specify any licensing requirements or commitments for Working
-      Group Notes.</p>
+        Policy</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>] does not
+      specify any licensing requirements or commitments for Working Group Notes.</p>
     <h3 id="rec-rescind">7.9 Rescinding a W3C Recommendation</h3>
     <p>W3C <em class="rfc2119">may</em> rescind a Recommendation, for example
       if the Recommendation contains many errors that conflict with a later
       version or if W3C discovers burdensome patent claims that affect
       implementers and cannot be resolved; see the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C
-        Patent Policy</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>]
-      and in particular <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy#sec-Requirements">section
+        Patent Policy</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>] and
+      in particular <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy#sec-Requirements">section
         5</a> (bullet 10) and <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy#sec-PAG-conclude">section
         7.5</a>. A Working Group <em class="rfc2119">may</em> request the
       Director to rescind a Recommendation which was a deliverable, or the
@@ -773,8 +769,8 @@
     </ul>
     <p>The Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em> announce the proposal to
       rescind a W3C Recommendation to other W3C groups, the public, and the <a
-        href="organization.html#AC">Advisory
-        Committee</a>. The announcement <em class="rfc2119">must</em>:</p>
+        href="organization.html#AC">Advisory Committee</a>. The announcement <em
+        class="rfc2119">must</em>:</p>
     <ul>
       <li>indicate that this is a Proposal to Rescind a Recommendation</li>
       <li>specify the deadline for review comments, which <em class="rfc2119">must</em>
@@ -784,15 +780,14 @@
         Working Groups;</li>
       <li>solicit public review.</li>
     </ul>
-    <p>If there was any <a href="policies.html#def-Dissent"
-        rel="glossary" title="Definition of Dissent"><span class="dfn-instance">dissent</span></a>
-      in Advisory Committee reviews, the Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em>
-      publish the substantive content of the dissent to W3C <strong>and the
-        public</strong>, and <em class="rfc2119">must</em> <a href="policies.html#formal-address">formally
-        address</a> the comment at least 14 days before publication as a
-      Rescinded Recommendation. In this case the <a href="organization.html#AC">Advisory
-        Committee</a> <em class="rfc2119">may</em> <a href="#ACAppeal">appeal</a>
-      the decision.</p>
+    <p>If there was any <a href="policies.html#def-Dissent" rel="glossary" title="Definition of Dissent"><span
+          class="dfn-instance">dissent</span></a> in Advisory Committee reviews,
+      the Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em> publish the substantive
+      content of the dissent to W3C <strong>and the public</strong>, and <em class="rfc2119">must</em>
+      <a href="policies.html#formal-address">formally address</a> the comment at
+      least 14 days before publication as a Rescinded Recommendation. In this
+      case the <a href="organization.html#AC">Advisory Committee</a> <em class="rfc2119">may</em>
+      <a href="#ACAppeal">appeal</a> the decision.</p>
     <p> A Rescinded Recommendation <em class="rfc2119">must</em> be published
       with up to date status. The updated version <em class="rfc2119">may</em>
       remove the rescinded content (i.e. the main body of the document).</p>
@@ -811,6 +806,5 @@
         </map>
       </div>
     </div>
-    
   </body>
 </html>