Continue cleaning out "HeartBeat" terminology, make sure First Public Working Draft is still identifiable for Patent Policy.
authorcharles
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 21:48:34 +0200
changeset 24 fcc8905e7d12
parent 23 391157a54386
child 25 519f6eaf97d9
Continue cleaning out "HeartBeat" terminology, make sure First Public Working Draft is still identifiable for Patent Policy.
tr.html
--- a/tr.html	Mon Sep 23 21:22:47 2013 +0200
+++ b/tr.html	Mon Sep 23 21:48:34 2013 +0200
@@ -170,50 +170,51 @@
               fill="none"></path>
             <polygon points="324.306,-21.5001 334.306,-18 324.306,-14.5001 324.306,-21.5001"
               stroke="black" fill="black"></polygon> </g> </g> </svg> </p>
-    <h3>Table of Contents</h3>
+    <h3><a class="mozTocH3" id="mozTocId316776"></a>Table of Contents</h3>
     <ul id="mozToc">
       <!--mozToc h3 1 h4 2 h5 3 h6 4-->
-      <li><a href="#mozTocId951868">General requirements for Technical Reports</a></li>
-      <li><a href="#mozTocId233783">7.1 Maturity Levels</a></li>
-      <li><a href="#mozTocId44043">7.2 General Requirements for Advancement on
+      <li><a href="#mozTocId316776">Table of Contents</a></li>
+      <li><a href="#mozTocId405414">General requirements for Technical Reports</a></li>
+      <li><a href="#mozTocId1729">7.1 Maturity Levels</a></li>
+      <li><a href="#mozTocId318562">7.2 General Requirements for Advancement on
           the Recommendation Track</a>
         <ul>
-          <li><a href="#mozTocId52529">7.2.2 Wide Review</a></li>
-          <li><a href="#mozTocId864535">7.2.3 Implementation Experience</a></li>
+          <li><a href="#mozTocId348163">7.2.2 Wide Review</a></li>
+          <li><a href="#mozTocId133300">7.2.3 Implementation Experience</a></li>
         </ul>
       </li>
-      <li><a href="#mozTocId157737">7.3 Reviews and Review Responsibilities</a></li>
-      <li><a href="#mozTocId302600">7.4 Advancing a Technical Report to
+      <li><a href="#mozTocId29135">7.3 Reviews and Review Responsibilities</a></li>
+      <li><a href="#mozTocId412309">7.4 Advancing a Technical Report to
           Recommendation</a>
         <ul>
-          <li><a href="#mozTocId226623">7.4.1.a First Public Working Draft</a></li>
-          <li><a href="#mozTocId442082">7.4.1.b "Heartbeat" Working Draft</a></li>
-          <li><a href="#mozTocId583091">7.4.2 Last Call Candidate Recommendation</a></li>
-          <li><a href="#mozTocId255357">7.4.5 Publication of a W3C
+          <li><a href="#mozTocId20175">7.4.1.a Working Draft</a></li>
+          <li><a href="#mozTocId87620">7.4.2 Last Call Candidate Recommendation</a></li>
+          <li><a href="#mozTocId707682">7.4.5 Publication of a W3C
               Recommendation</a>
             <ul>
-              <li><a href="#mozTocId783340">Publishing a Last Call Candidate
+              <li><a href="#mozTocId848355">Publishing a Last Call Candidate
                   Recommendation as a W3C Recommendation</a></li>
-              <li><a href="#mozTocId17935">Publishing an Edited Recommendation
+              <li><a href="#mozTocId961203">Publishing an Edited Recommendation
                   (See also Modifying a Recommendation below)</a></li>
-              <li><a href="#mozTocId706375">For all W3C Recommendations</a></li>
+              <li><a href="#mozTocId138350">For all W3C Recommendations</a></li>
             </ul>
           </li>
         </ul>
       </li>
-      <li><a href="#mozTocId995044">7.5 Publishing a Working Group or Interest
+      <li><a href="#mozTocId151871">7.5 Publishing a Working Group or Interest
           Group Note</a></li>
-      <li><a href="#mozTocId968883">7.6 Modifying a W3C Recommendation</a>
+      <li><a href="#mozTocId986536">7.6 Modifying a W3C Recommendation</a>
         <ul>
-          <li><a href="#mozTocId784400">7.6.1 Errata Management</a></li>
-          <li><a href="#mozTocId12613">7.6.2 Classes of Changes to a
+          <li><a href="#mozTocId565826">7.6.1 Errata Management</a></li>
+          <li><a href="#mozTocId347486">7.6.2 Classes of Changes to a
               Recommendation</a></li>
         </ul>
       </li>
-      <li><a href="#mozTocId618407">7.7 Rescinding a W3C Recommendation</a></li>
-      <li><a href="#mozTocId577828">Good practices</a></li>
+      <li><a href="#mozTocId990936">7.7 Rescinding a W3C Recommendation</a></li>
+      <li><a href="#mozTocId589973">Good practices</a></li>
     </ul>
-    <h3>General requirements for Technical Reports</h3>
+    <h3><a class="mozTocH3" id="mozTocId405414"></a>General requirements for
+      Technical Reports</h3>
     <p>Every document published as part of the technical report development
       process <em class="rfc2119 old">must</em> be a public document. The <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/">index
         of W3C technical reports</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-doc-list">PUB11</a>]
@@ -261,7 +262,8 @@
       the translation of its technical reports. <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Translation/">Information
         about translations of W3C technical reports</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-translations">PUB18</a>]
       is available at the W3C Web site.<span class="from">(was in 7.8)</span></p>
-    <h3>7.1 <a name="maturity-levels" id="maturity-levels">Maturity Levels</a></h3>
+    <h3><a class="mozTocH3" id="mozTocId1729"></a>7.1 <a name="maturity-levels"
+        id="maturity-levels">Maturity Levels</a></h3>
     <dl>
       <dt><a name="RecsWD" id="RecsWD">Working Draft (WD)</a></dt>
       <dd>A Working Draft is a document that W3C has published for review by the
@@ -331,8 +333,9 @@
       Group, nor are their contents endorsed in any way by W3C or its members,
       except to the extent that such contents happen to be consistent with some
       other document which carries a higher level of endorsement.</p>
-    <h3>7.2 <a name="transition-reqs" id="transition-reqs">General Requirements
-        for Advancement on the Recommendation Track</a></h3>
+    <h3><a class="mozTocH3" id="mozTocId318562"></a>7.2 <a name="transition-reqs"
+        id="transition-reqs">General Requirements for Advancement on the
+        Recommendation Track</a></h3>
     <p>For <em>all</em> requests to advance a specification to a new maturity
       level other than Note the Working Group:</p>
     <ul>
@@ -364,7 +367,8 @@
       <li class="new"><em class="rfc2119">should</em> document known
         implementation.</li>
     </ul>
-    <h4>7.2.2 <a id="wide-review">Wide Review</a></h4>
+    <h4><a class="mozTocH4" id="mozTocId348163"></a>7.2.2 <a id="wide-review">Wide
+        Review</a></h4>
     <p>The requirements for wide review are not precisely defined by the
       process. The objective is to ensure that the entire set of stakeholders of
       the Web community, including the general public, have had adequate notice
@@ -378,9 +382,9 @@
       clear communication to the general public about appropriate times and
       which content to review. </p>
     <p>As an example, inviting review of new or significantly revised sections
-      published in Heartbeat Working Drafts, and tracking those comments and the
-      Working Group's responses, is generally a good practice which would often
-      be considered positive evidence of wide review. A recommended practice is
+      published in Working Drafts, and tracking those comments and the Working
+      Group's responses, is generally a good practice which would often be
+      considered positive evidence of wide review. A recommended practice is
       making a specific announcement to other W3C Working Groups as well as the
       general public that a group proposes to enter Last Call Candidate
       Recommendation in e.g. approximately four weeks, . By contrast a generic
@@ -392,7 +396,8 @@
       receiving many detailed reviews is not necessarily the same as wide
       review, since they may only represent comment from a small segment of the
       relevant stakeholder community.</p>
-    <h4 id="implementation-experience">7.2.3 Implementation Experience</h4>
+    <h4 id="implementation-experience"><a class="mozTocH4" id="mozTocId133300"></a>7.2.3
+      Implementation Experience</h4>
     <p>Implementation experience is required to show that a specification is
       sufficiently clear, complete, and relevant to market needs that
       independent interoperable implementations of each feature of the
@@ -409,8 +414,8 @@
       <li>is there implementation experience at all levels of the
         specification's ecosystem (creation, consuming, publishing…)?</li>
     </ul>
-    <h3>7.3 <a name="doc-reviews" id="doc-reviews">Reviews and Review
-        Responsibilities</a></h3>
+    <h3><a class="mozTocH3" id="mozTocId29135"></a>7.3 <a name="doc-reviews" id="doc-reviews">Reviews
+        and Review Responsibilities</a></h3>
     <p>A document is available for review from the moment it is first published.
       Working Groups <em class="rfc2119">should</em> <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#formal-address">formally
         address</a> <em>any</em> substantive review comment about a technical
@@ -422,14 +427,14 @@
       would cause significant compatibility problems due to existing
       implementation</span>. Worthy ideas <em class="rfc2119">should</em> be
     recorded even when not incorporated into a mature document.
-    <h3>7.4 <a name="rec-advance" id="rec-advance">Advancing a Technical Report
-        to Recommendation</a></h3>
+    <h3><a class="mozTocH3" id="mozTocId412309"></a>7.4 <a name="rec-advance" id="rec-advance">Advancing
+        a Technical Report to Recommendation</a></h3>
     <p>W3C follows these steps when advancing a technical report to
       Recommendation.</p>
     <ol>
       <li><a href="#first-wd">Publication of the First Public Working Draft</a>,</li>
-      <li><a href="#hb-wd">Publication of zero or more "Heartbeat" Public
-          Working Drafts</a>.</li>
+      <li><a href="#hb-wd">Publication of zero or more revised Public Working
+          Drafts</a>.</li>
       <li><a href="#last-call">Publication of a Last Call Candidate
           Recommendation</a>.</li>
       <li><a href="#rec-publication">Publication as a Recommendation</a>.</li>
@@ -444,7 +449,9 @@
         Committee</a> and group Chairs when a technical report has been refused
       permission to advance in maturity level and returned to a Working Group
       for further work.</p>
-    <h4>7.4.1.a <a name="first-wd" id="first-wd">Working Draft</a> </h4>
+    <h4 id="working-draft">7.4.1 Working Draft</h4>
+    <h5>7.4.1.a <a name="first-wd" id="first-wd">First Public Working Draft</a></h5>
+    <h4> </h4>
     <p>To publish the First Public Working Draft of a document, in addition to
       meeting the <a href="#transition-reqs">general requirements for
         advancement</a> a Working Group</p>
@@ -472,7 +479,8 @@
       when there have been significant changes to the document that would
       benefit from review from beyond the Working Group<em class="rfc2119"></em>.<span
         class="from">(was must in @@ch4?)</span> </p>
-    <p>To publish a new Working draft, a Working Group <span class="from">(copied
+    <h5 id="revised-wd">7.4.1b Revised Public Working Drafts</h5>
+    <p>To publish a revised Working draft, a Working Group <span class="from">(copied
         since this is not a new maturity level)</span> </p>
     <ul>
       <li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> record the group's decision to request
@@ -494,12 +502,12 @@
     </ul>
     <p>Possible next steps:</p>
     <ul>
-      <li><a href="#hb-wd">Working Draft</a></li>
+      <li><a href="#hb-wd">Revised Public Working Draft</a></li>
       <li><a href="#last-call">Last Call Candidate recommendation</a>.</li>
       <li><a href="#tr-end">Working Group Note</a></li>
     </ul>
-    <h4>7.4.2 <a name="last-call" id="last-call">Last Call Candidate
-        Recommendation </a></h4>
+    <h4><a class="mozTocH4" id="mozTocId87620"></a>7.4.2 <a name="last-call" id="last-call">Last
+        Call Candidate Recommendation </a></h4>
     <p>To publish a Last Call Candidate recommendation, in addition to meeting
       the <a href="#transition-reqs">general requirements for advancement</a> a
       Working Group</p>
@@ -538,7 +546,7 @@
       Recommendation. </p>
     <p>Possible next steps:</p>
     <ul>
-      <li>Return to <a href="#hb-wd">Heartbeat Working Draft</a></li>
+      <li>Return to <a href="#hb-wd">Working Draft</a></li>
       <li>Return to <a href="#last-call">Last Call Candidate Recommendation</a></li>
       <li><a href="#rec-publication">Request Recommendation status</a> (The
         expected next step)</li>
@@ -553,10 +561,11 @@
     <p> <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
         Committee</a> representatives <em class="rfc2119">may</em> <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/acreview.html#ACAppeal">appeal</a>
       the decision to advance the technical report.</p>
-    <h4>7.4.5 <a name="rec-publication" id="rec-publication">Publication of a
-        W3C Recommendation</a></h4>
-    <h5><a name="lcrec-publication" id="lcrec-publication">Publishing a Last
-        Call Candidate Recommendation as a W3C Recommendation</a></h5>
+    <h4><a class="mozTocH4" id="mozTocId707682"></a>7.4.5 <a name="rec-publication"
+        id="rec-publication">Publication of a W3C Recommendation</a></h4>
+    <h5><a class="mozTocH5" id="mozTocId848355"></a><a name="lcrec-publication"
+        id="lcrec-publication">Publishing a Last Call Candidate Recommendation
+        as a W3C Recommendation</a></h5>
     <p>To publish a Last Call Candidate Recommendation as a W3C Recommendation,
       a Working Group</p>
     <ul>
@@ -593,8 +602,9 @@
         Recommendation less than 35 days after the publication of the Last Call
         Candidate Recommendation on which is it based. [editor's note - this is
         to allow for the patent policy exclusion period to expire]</span></p>
-    <h5 id="rec-edited">Publishing an Edited Recommendation (See also <a href="#rec-modify">Modifying
-        a Recommendation</a> below)</h5>
+    <h5 id="rec-edited"><a class="mozTocH5" id="mozTocId961203"></a>Publishing
+      an Edited Recommendation (See also <a href="#rec-modify">Modifying a
+        Recommendation</a> below)</h5>
     <p>To publish an Edited Recommendation as a W3C Recommendation, a Working
       Group</p>
     <ul class="new">
@@ -605,7 +615,7 @@
       <li><em class="rfc2119">should</em> document known implementation.</li>
       <li><em class="rfc2119">should</em> address all errata.</li>
     </ul>
-    <h5>For all W3C Recommendations</h5>
+    <h5><a class="mozTocH5" id="mozTocId138350"></a>For all W3C Recommendations</h5>
     <p>The Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em> announce the provisional
       approval of a Request for publication of a W3C Recommendation to the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
         Committee</a>.</p>
@@ -632,8 +642,8 @@
           an Edited Recommendation</a>, or</li>
       <li><em class="rfc2119">may</em> be <a href="#rec-rescind">rescinded</a>.</li>
     </ul>
-    <h3>7.5 <a name="tr-end" id="tr-end">Publishing a Working Group <span class="new">or
-          Interest Group</span> Note</a></h3>
+    <h3><a class="mozTocH3" id="mozTocId151871"></a>7.5 <a name="tr-end" id="tr-end">Publishing
+        a Working Group <span class="new">or Interest Group</span> Note</a></h3>
     <p class="new">Working Groups and Interest Groups publish material that is
       not a formal specification as Notes. This may include supporting
       documentation for a specification, such as requirements, use cases,
@@ -671,10 +681,12 @@
       requirements, unless work is resumed and it is subsequently published as a
       W3C Recommendation. See also the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C
         Patent Policy</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>].</p>
-    <h3>7.6 <a name="rec-modify" id="rec-modify">Modifying a W3C Recommendation</a></h3>
+    <h3><a class="mozTocH3" id="mozTocId986536"></a>7.6 <a name="rec-modify" id="rec-modify">Modifying
+        a W3C Recommendation</a></h3>
     <p>The following sections discuss the management of errors and the process
       for making normative changes to a Recommendation.</p>
-    <h4>7.6.1 <a name="errata" id="errata">Errata Management</a></h4>
+    <h4><a class="mozTocH4" id="mozTocId565826"></a>7.6.1 <a name="errata" id="errata">Errata
+        Management</a></h4>
     <p>Tracking errors is an important part of a Working Group's ongoing care of
       a Recommendation; for this reason, the scope of a Working Group charter
       generally allows time for work after publication of a Recommendation. In
@@ -705,8 +717,8 @@
       become normative, according to the Team's requirements. For instance, the
       Team might set up a mailing list per Recommendation where a Working Group
       reports changes to an errata page.</p>
-    <h4>7.6.2 <a name="correction-classes" id="correction-classes">Classes of
-        Changes to a Recommendation</a></h4>
+    <h4><a class="mozTocH4" id="mozTocId347486"></a>7.6.2 <a name="correction-classes"
+        id="correction-classes">Classes of Changes to a Recommendation</a></h4>
     <p>This document distinguishes the following classes of changes to a
       Recommendation.</p>
     <dl>
@@ -762,8 +774,8 @@
     <p>For the fourth class of change (new features), W3C <span class="rfc2119">MUST</span>
       follow the full process of <a href="#rec-advance">advancing a technical
         report to Recommendation</a>.</p>
-    <h3>7.7 <a name="rec-rescind" id="rec-rescind">Rescinding a W3C
-        Recommendation</a></h3>
+    <h3><a class="mozTocH3" id="mozTocId990936"></a>7.7 <a name="rec-rescind" id="rec-rescind">Rescinding
+        a W3C Recommendation</a></h3>
     <p>W3C <em class="rfc2119">may</em> rescind a Recommendation, for example
       if the Recommendation contains many errors that conflict with a later
       version or if W3C discovers burdensome patent claims that affect
@@ -823,7 +835,7 @@
         publication</span> as a Rescinded Recommendation. In this case the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
         Committee</a> <em class="rfc2119">may</em> <a href="#ACAppeal">appeal</a>
       the decision.</p>
-    <h3>Good practices</h3>
+    <h3><a class="mozTocH3" id="mozTocId589973"></a>Good practices</h3>
     <p>Refer to <a href="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/Transitions">"How to
         Organize a Recommendation Track Transition"</a> in the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Guide/">Member
         guide</a> for practical information about preparing for the reviews and